The Cult of Parenthood: A Qualitative Study of
|
|
ID |
Gender |
Age at Interview |
Age at Separation |
Custodial Parent |
Alienating Parent |
|
1 |
Female |
40 |
3 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
2 |
Female |
47 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
3 |
Female |
35 |
12 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
4 |
Female |
44 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
5 |
Female |
30 |
13 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
6 |
Female |
30 |
Birth |
Mother |
Mother |
|
7 |
Male |
40 |
9 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
8 |
Female |
33 |
3 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
9 |
Male |
38 |
5 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
10 |
Female |
32 |
2 |
Father |
Father |
|
11 |
Male |
43 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
12 |
Female |
50 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
13 |
Female |
33 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
14 |
Female |
36 |
2 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
15 |
Male |
67 |
NA |
Both |
Father |
|
16 |
Male |
43 |
5 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
17 |
Male |
28 |
11 |
Father |
Father |
|
18 |
Female |
26 |
2 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
19 |
Female |
51 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
20 |
Male |
48 |
12 |
Mother |
Father |
|
21 |
Female |
44 |
12 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
22 |
Male |
39 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
23 |
Female |
28 |
3 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
24 |
Male |
32 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
25 |
Female |
43 |
12 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
26 |
Male |
57 |
2 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
27 |
Female |
19 |
8 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
28 |
Female |
32 |
NA |
Both |
Father |
|
29 |
Male |
63 |
NA |
Both |
Mother |
|
30 |
Male |
39 |
2 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
31 |
Female |
60 |
Birth |
Mother |
Mother |
|
32 |
Female |
50 |
11 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
33 |
Female |
21 |
2 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
34 |
Male |
39 |
4 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
35 |
Female |
19 |
1 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
36 |
Female |
41 |
3 |
Mother |
Father |
|
37 |
Male |
52 |
8 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
38 |
Male |
46 |
2 |
Mother |
Mother |
|
39 |
Female |
37 |
Birth |
Mother |
Mother |
|
40 |
Female |
50 |
5 |
Mother |
Mother |
Interviews followed a semi-structured protocol which ensured that the same information was obtained from all participants while allowing each person to “tell their story” in full. The interview schedule was developed in order to capture the 12 aspects of the qualitative research interview as outlined in Kvale (1996, p. 27). That is, the interview aimed to understand in a focused way the subject’s every day life world as it related to parental alienation and the meaning of the alienation for them, in a qualitative rather than quantitative form, with an emphasis on description of specific experiences. This information was obtained through a sensitively conducted interpersonal exchange that because of the deliberate naiveté of the interviewer allowed the subject to express ambiguous statements and come to new and/or changed understandings. The interview was conducted in such a manner as to produce a positive experience for the participant.
The interview had five major sections. The first section of the interview obtained basic
demographic information including age, gender, place of birth, and so forth. Section two focused on memories of the marriage, the participant’s relationship
to each parent up until the time of the separation/divorce, how the participant was told about the separation, who moved out of the house and a description of
the custody/visitation schedule through the age of 18.[2] The third section of the
interview focused on the alienation, beginning with which parent was the alienating parent and which was the targeted parent. Participants were asked to list
all of the different strategies used by the alienating parent and to provide examples of each. The participant was asked to describe his/her relationship to
the targeted parent and how that changed over time, as well as the participant’s relationship to the alienating parent during this period. This section ended
with a discussion of how the targeted parent tried to counter the alienation, whether the participant knew about these attempts at the time, and the perceived
motivation of the alienating parent. In the fourth section of the interview, the participants were asked about when his or her thinking eventually changed
about the targeted parent. They were queried about when they began to realize that their feelings and thoughts about the targeted parent were induced by the
alienating parent rather than based wholly in reality. Whether or not the alienating parent was ever confronted, whether the targeted parent was told about
the realization, and what, if anything, could the targeted parent have done to mitigate the alienation were discussed. Any reunification with the targeted
parent was described in full including who initiated it and what happened. The final section of the interview entailed a conversation about the person’s life
at the present, including what kind of relationship he or she had with each parent and what the impact of the alienation has been. At the end of the interview
a checklist was reviewed in order to ensure consistency of data across participants.
Audiotapes were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were then submitted to a content analysis in which each unique unit
of thought was separated from the transcript and taped onto an index card. Content analysis was guided by an inductive grounded theory approach (Berg, 1998;
Straus, 1987) in which the texts were read in order to identify the major themes. Cards were then coded according to its essential idea (i.e., relationship
with targeted parent prior to the alienation, strategies utilized by the alienating parent, impact of the alienation). In all there were 11 major categories
including a category on the strategies utilized by the alienating parent. These “strategy” cards were further coded into sub-categories that produced the
major findings presented in the current paper. This paper also draws on the data collected pertaining to their relationship with the alienating parent. All
quotes are attributed to the participant number so that the reader can determine the age and gender of the speaker as well as whether his or her parents
separated/divorced, age of that event, and who the custodial parent was.
Cults are organized around a leader, typically described as a charismatic individual who maintains ultimate power and authority over the group. Within the cult the leader is designated as worthy of devotion and awe because of his or her superior capacity to comprehend the true nature of reality. Due to this supposed unique and valuable knowledge, leaders are presented as able to understand members better than they understand themselves. It is held that through great personal sacrifice, cult leaders are willing to share this knowledge on behalf of the members who require the wisdom and the guidance of the leader in order to function. In return, members are expected to reserve their love and devotion exclusively for the leader, who has earned an elevated place at the center of their emotional lives. Cult leaders have been compared to both psychopaths (Tobias & Lalich, 1994) and narcissists (Shaw, 2003) because of their lack of humility in presenting themselves as superior to others and because of their willingness to use their charm and persuasion skills in order to exploit and unduly influence others.
The adult children who participated in the interviews described the alienating parent in similar terms. In particular, they perceived the alienating parent as needing to be the center of attention at all times and insisting on being the center of the child’s emotional life. “She was the center and everything revolved around her.” (31) Another participant said, “Mainly I think she always wants to be your everything. She wants to be your center of attention. And so she liked the fact that by making me hate him all I had was her.” (27) In fact, many of the interview subjects described their parents as narcissistic, either using that label or using precise descriptors that called that term to mind.
In cults, it is not enough to feel devotion to the leader; members are expected to demonstrate their devotion on a regular basis. Expressions of devotion include putting the needs of the leader first, never questioning the authority of the leader, confessing imperfections, allowing the leader to make all important decisions, and making public declarations of faith and love. These actions reassure the leader that the member is fully indoctrinated and further solidify the member’s commitment to the cult (Lifton, 1989). In many cases the expressions of devotion are public, with the aim of turning a public declaration of devotion into an inner desire to be loyal to the leader. By requiring such public assertions of faith and trust in the leader, cult leaders are exploiting the natural tendency in people to want their beliefs to be consistent with their actions (e.g. Festinger, 1957). In this way saying becomes believing.[3]
This process also occurred in the families of alienation. The participants reported feeling pressured to show their devotion to the alienating parent. Many described their relationship with the alienating parent as one in which their parent’s needs were felt as more real and urgent to them than their own. They recalled staying home from social activities to tend to their parent, to keep them company, to take care of younger siblings, or to perform household duties. “I did what I could do to make her life easier because her life was so hard because of my father. That was my mantra, mom’s life is hard. I have to try to help her. (40)” They chose friends, hobbies, and eventually careers and spouses to please their parent. Others reported that they grew up believing that it was their job to satisfy the needs of their parent, exemplified in the statement, “I was there to help her. It would make me want to try harder to please her. I learned how to be amusing at a very young age. “ (27) In general, they experienced themselves as extensions of their parent, their primary function in life being to take care of, please, admire, reassure, and be devoted to them.
A particularly important expression of devotion was an allegiance to and preference for the alienating parent over the targeted parent. Some of the participants recalled being asked to spy on the targeted parent and keep secrets from him or her. Many participants said that they had made negative reports to the alienating parent about the targeted parent such as saying that they did not have a good time during visits, exaggerating small infractions or hurts, and making false claims of harm. Joining the alienating parent in the belittling of the targeted parent was another means of showing devotion. A few participants recalled mocking the targeted parent, and one told of being encouraged to spit, hit, and sexually humiliate his mother at the behest of his father. Devotion also took the form of making accusations against the targeted parent for real and fabricated allegations, including stealing the child’s personal items and shirking financial obligations such as child support payments.
As with cults, loyalty and devotion in alienating families was extracted either through sweet seduction or through wrathful commands (and usually an alternating sequence of both). An example of the former was provided by a woman who described her mother and stepfather as being “nicer than nice,” doing everything for her until she eventually believed, “that they were the only ones we could rely on, that we had to be with them. (1)” In her family, demonstrations of loyalty took the form of hiding from her father when he came to visit and being rude to people in the neighborhood that her mother and stepfather singled out as being worthy of contempt. Another woman recalled her mother saying, “Don’t you want to stay here with me and your sister? Your sister understands that to go over there is to go with people who don’t like me. I am your mother don’t you want to like me? (33)” Through a combination of rhetorical skill and guilt inducement this mother compelled her daughter to reject her father.
At the other end of the spectrum of strategies for extracting loyalty was a young man who grew up with a raging drunken father. He explained that, “There was a constant ritual everyday. He would come in my room in the middle of the night and make me profess my faith to him and if I didn’t and if I didn’t stay away from everybody else that he was going to kill himself. He would do this and I would have nobody.” (17) And one woman reported that her father wanted her to profess her exclusive love for him, and would beat her until she did so. Many participants reported having to constantly reassure their alienating parents that they loved them best of all, and that they did not in fact have positive feelings for the targeted parent. “She’d start crying and say we didn’t love her and that’s just how she is.” (36)
The ultimate sign of devotion and loyalty to a cult leader entails renouncing all other sources of influence. Just as cult leaders require an exclusive place in the hearts and minds of the members, these alienating parents seemed to want to have sole claim on their children. Allegiance to the other parent was not allowed in these families and the participants understood that there was to be an exclusive and all encompassing relationship with only one parent. They were made to feel that any contact with the targeted parent was a betrayal of the worst kind. One man said of his mother, “If I talked about my dad it was like sticking a knife in her back.” (9) Another said he felt like a traitor when he came back from a visit. Ultimately, many of the participants were encouraged if not coerced to renounce their relationship with the targeted parent. Loving both parents would have been unthinkable, just as belonging to two cults at the same time is not possible. And in this way, many of the participants felt that they had to make a choice between their parents. Naturally, they chose the parent whom they believed really loved them and was able to take care of them, the one who had been telling them all along that the other parent was unsafe, worthy of contempt, and did not even love them in return (see section beginning on page 14 below). In time, most of the participants were turned against the targeted parent completely, withdrawing their love and natural affection for them. More than one made a comment such as, “I remember thinking he should go ahead and die. I wish he’d just go get in a car accident. I wish he’d die. I didn’t want him to come home.” (22) Another said, “I did believe her that he was a terrible rotten person who beat my mother and thank god she divorced him.” (16) The intensity of these and other similar statements reflect the utter lack of ambivalence, (one parent is all good while the other is all bad), which is a hallmark of parental alienation syndrome (Gardner, 1998).
Thus, in these families, the normal love and respect that children naturally feel for a parent appeared to be
insufficient to satisfy the narcissistic demands of the alienating parent. What they seemed to want from their children was a level of adulation and
exclusivity typically reserved for cult leaders. They seemed to garner that level of devotion in much the same way that cult leaders do: through a range of
emotional manipulation and persuasion techniques. The strategies employed by the alienating parents – as described by their adult children -- are described
below.
The second characteristic of cults is that leaders manipulate the thoughts and feelings of its members in order to promote a sense of dependency on them (e.g., Hassan, 1988; Lifton, 1989; Singer, 1996). This too was borne out in the interviews of adults who as children were alienated from a parent due to the actions and behaviors of the other parent. There were five primary mechanisms for manipulating the thoughts and feelings of the children: (1) relentless bad mouthing of the character of the other parent in order to reduce their importance and value (2) creating the impression that the targeted parent was dangerous and planned to hurt the child in order to instill fear in and rejection of that parent (3) deceiving children about the targeted parent’s feelings for them in order to create hurt, resentment, and psychological distance (4) withdrawing love if the child indicated affection or positive regard for the targeted parent in order to heighten the need to please the alienating parent and